← boothcheck

LITE vs NOK stock comparison

Lumentum Holdings Inc. vs Nokia Corporation, two Communication Equipment stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Lumentum carries 1.1 turns of debt against equity and a 1.14 current ratio, a balance sheet already working hard, while Nokia holds no debt at all; the caution and the courage are distributed opposite to the multiples. The market pays 147.1 times Lumentum's earnings for AI-datacenter photonics momentum and 99.7 times Nokia's for a margin-repair story, two triple-digit multiples reached from different directions: one on compressed earnings climbing, one on collapsed earnings hoping. The operating gap is real, 21.6% against 4.5%. Free cash favors Nokia today, 3.2% against 0.15%. Two European-rooted networking names priced for futures their trailing years cannot justify; only one currently shows the future arriving.

Comparison updated 2026-07-10.

LITE vs NOK: the numbers

MetricLITENOK
Price$814.63$13.00
Market cap$78.4B$70.4B
SectorCommunication EquipmentCommunication Equipment
StageGrowthMature
P/E147.199.7
P/B26.363.08
P/S31.493.26
EV/EBITDA222.829.6
Revenue growth+67.5%-2.4%
Gross margin44.2%43.5%
Operating margin21.6%4.5%
Net margin17.7%3.3%
Return on equity14.8%3.1%
Return on assets6.3%1.8%
Return on invested capital3.0%2.9%
FCF yield0.1%3.2%
Debt / equity1.100.00
Current ratio1.141.58
Altman Z (solvency)6.403.21
Piotroski F (quality)6 / 95 / 9
Full LITE report → Full NOK report →
Get boothcheck's read on LITE and NOK, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.