← boothcheck

KMB vs REYN stock comparison

KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION vs REYNOLDS CONSUMER PRODUCTS INC., two Paper & Packaging stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Here are two consumer-staples packagers priced almost identically on earnings, 17.19 times for Kimberly-Clark and 17.2 times for Reynolds Consumer Products. Kimberly-Clark runs the wider net margin, 12.8% against 8.7%, pays the larger dividend, 4.6% against 3.43%, and carries lighter debt, 0.32 against 0.68. Reynolds converts a bit more to free cash, 5.74% against 5.04%. The size gap is the headline: Kimberly-Clark at $36.5B is more than six times Reynolds' $5.7B, with a far broader shelf of tissue and personal-care brands against Reynolds' foil, wraps, and bags. Same rough earnings multiple, but the larger, higher-margin, better-paying name is Kimberly-Clark.

Comparison updated 2026-07-11.

KMB vs REYN: the numbers

MetricKMBREYN
Price$112.38$26.25
Market cap$37.4B$5.6B
SectorPaper & PackagingPaper & Packaging
StageMatureMature
Implied growth (priced in)-4.0%+7.5%
P/E17.616.8
P/B19.562.45
P/S2.261.47
EV/EBITDA14.151.6
Revenue growth+0.2%+2.9%
Gross margin36.9%23.6%
Operating margin18.1%
Net margin12.8%8.7%
Return on equity110.7%14.5%
Return on assets12.3%6.7%
Return on invested capital77.4%
FCF yield4.9%5.9%
Dividend yield4.5%3.5%
Debt / equity0.320.68
Current ratio0.771.79
Altman Z (solvency)7.802.37
Piotroski F (quality)8 / 95 / 9
Full KMB report → Full REYN report →
Get boothcheck's read on KMB and REYN, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.