← boothcheck

GH vs NTRA stock comparison

GUARDANT HEALTH, INC. vs NATERA, INC., two Medical Diagnostics stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Guardant and Natera are the same wager at different stages: molecular screening franchises spending through their income statements toward dominance, Guardant in cancer detection at a negative 40.2% operating margin, Natera in prenatal-and-oncology testing at negative 13.4%, further along the curve toward break-even. The market prices progress steeply: $37B for Natera against $20B for Guardant, nearly double for the smaller loss. Both balance sheets hold defensive liquidity and negligible debt; neither returns meaningful cash. No multiples exist on either page. The pair asks one question twice: how much is a diagnostics land-grab worth before the land pays rent? The market's two answers differ mainly by how close the rent sounds.

Comparison updated 2026-07-10.

GH vs NTRA: the numbers

MetricGHNTRA
Price$149.32$260.64
Market cap$19.6B$36.9B
SectorMedical DiagnosticsMedical Diagnostics
StageGrowthGrowth
P/B20.79
P/S18.1514.75
Revenue growth+39.3%+36.4%
Operating margin-40.2%-13.4%
Net margin-40.1%-9.1%
Return on equity-12.8%
Return on assets-22.6%-8.7%
Return on invested capital-26.7%-13.8%
FCF yield-1.2%0.3%
Debt / equity0.05
Current ratio4.682.96
Altman Z (solvency)4.375.81
Piotroski F (quality)3 / 94 / 9
Full GH report → Full NTRA report →
Get boothcheck's read on GH and NTRA, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.