← boothcheck

FMS vs UHS stock comparison

FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE AG vs UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC., two Medical Care stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

6.08 is where this pair starts: Universal Health's multiple, half of Fresenius Medical's 12.7, both among the lowest in health services. The cheapness differs in kind: UHS earns strong hospital margins, 11.2% operating and 20.2% on equity, that the market expects to fade; Fresenius earns regulated dialysis margins, 11.7% operating and 8.3% on equity, that the market expects to stay squeezed. Both generate cash aggressively, free-cash yields of 10.2% and 21.5%, with small dividends. Debt is moderate at UHS, absent at Fresenius. Two discounts for two different distrusts, cyclical and political; the page prices skepticism twice and lets the reader pick the cheaper fear.

Comparison updated 2026-07-10.

FMS vs UHS: the numbers

MetricFMSUHS
Price$23.25$145.68
Market cap$13.6B$9.0B
SectorMedical CareMedical Care
StageMatureMature
P/E12.76.1
P/B0.871.19
P/S0.640.51
EV/EBITDA3.35.4
Revenue growth+1.5%+10.4%
Operating margin11.7%11.2%
Net margin6.1%8.6%
Return on equity8.3%20.2%
Return on assets3.8%9.7%
Return on invested capital10.1%12.0%
FCF yield21.4%10.2%
Dividend yield1.7%0.6%
Debt / equity0.000.72
Current ratio1.261.08
Altman Z (solvency)1.767.26
Piotroski F (quality)8 / 97 / 9
Full FMS report → Full UHS report →
Get boothcheck's read on FMS and UHS, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.