FIGS, Inc. vs Ermenegildo Zegna N.V., two Apparel stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.
Figs sells scrubs to nurses online; Ermenegildo Zegna sells suits to the wealthy through boutiques. Both are pricey, Figs at 52.68 times earnings and Zegna at 31.76, and both run without debt. Their profitability sits in a similar range, Zegna at 9.96% on equity and Figs at 9.44%, with net margins of 5.71% and 6.1%. The cash gap is wide: Zegna yields 8.14% in free cash flow against Figs's 1.74%. Zegna is the larger and older name by revenue though similar in market value at $3.4B versus $2.3B. Two brand bets at opposite ends of the wardrobe.
Comparison updated 2026-07-11.
| Metric | FIGS | ZGN |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $10.02 | $13.44 |
| Market cap | $2.0B | $3.5B |
| Sector | Apparel | Apparel |
| Stage | Growth | Mature |
| P/E | 45.5 | 32.5 |
| P/B | 4.56 | 2.92 |
| P/S | 2.95 | 1.67 |
| EV/EBITDA | 35.5 | 7.8 |
| Revenue growth | +18.8% | +10.9% |
| Gross margin | 67.7% | 67.5% |
| Operating margin | 2.8% | 7.3% |
| Net margin | 6.1% | 5.7% |
| Return on equity | 9.4% | 10.0% |
| Return on assets | 7.2% | 3.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 9.7% | 9.9% |
| FCF yield | 2.0% | 8.0% |
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 5.39 | 1.59 |
| Altman Z (solvency) | 8.22 | 7.02 |
| Piotroski F (quality) | 5 / 9 | 7 / 9 |
Each week boothcheck ranks the stocks whose prices are betting on the most. Read the most stretched bets archive →
boothcheck is also on Android. Get the app on Google Play →
The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.