eBay Inc. vs RELX PLC, two Internet Retail stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.
eBay hosts a marketplace where strangers trade goods; RELX sells data subscriptions professionals renew. RELX carries the richer margin at 21.67% against eBay's 17.61%, and the higher multiple at 21.99 times earnings versus eBay's 24.47, actually close on price. On cash the marketplace lags, converting 4.95% of its value to free cash where RELX manages 6.2%. eBay runs a lighter book at 0.17 debt to equity. The contrast is durability: eBay depends on listings and buyers showing up, RELX on renewals that arrive whether anyone shows up or not. A transaction business beside a subscription one, priced surprisingly alike on earnings.
Comparison updated 2026-07-11.
| Metric | EBAY | RELX |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $117.21 | $32.45 |
| Market cap | $53.6B | $59.5B |
| Sector | Internet Retail | Internet Retail |
| Stage | Mature | Mature |
| Implied growth (priced in) | +18.4% | +1.9% |
| P/E | 26.6 | 22.8 |
| P/B | 12.14 | 19.68 |
| P/S | 4.62 | 4.90 |
| EV/EBITDA | 21.7 | 12.4 |
| Revenue growth | +12.5% | +7.5% |
| Gross margin | 74.0% | 66.3% |
| Operating margin | 19.8% | 31.6% |
| Net margin | 17.6% | 21.7% |
| Return on equity | 46.3% | 87.0% |
| Return on assets | 11.4% | 14.1% |
| Return on invested capital | 36.5% | 95.7% |
| FCF yield | 4.6% | 6.0% |
| Debt / equity | 0.17 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 1.22 | 0.49 |
| Altman Z (solvency) | 6.32 | 3.36 |
| Piotroski F (quality) | 7 / 9 | 8 / 9 |
Each week boothcheck ranks the stocks whose prices are betting on the most. Read the most stretched bets archive →
boothcheck is also on Android. Get the app on Google Play →
The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.