← boothcheck

DAR vs GIS stock comparison

DARLING INGREDIENTS INC. vs General Mills, Inc., two Food & Beverage stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Where DAR and GIS diverge most: on revenue growth, DAR reads +14.8% and GIS reads -5.3%; on operating margin, DAR reads 32.2% and GIS reads -45.4%. The rest of the comparable metrics sit closer together. What DAR's price implies is a bet that sits within the historical range (whole-company basis). The bull and bear cases for each are in their full reports below.

DAR vs GIS: the numbers

MetricDARGIS
Price$65.05$35.84
Market cap$10.4B$19.3B
SectorFood & BeverageFood & Beverage
StageGrowthMature
Implied growth (priced in)-0.3%—
P/E17.5—
P/B1.972.61
P/S1.601.05
EV/EBITDA9.732.5
Revenue growth+14.8%-5.3%
Gross margin29.2%34.8%
Operating margin32.2%-45.4%
Net margin9.1%-6.2%
Return on equity11.3%-15.5%
Return on assets5.4%-3.8%
Return on invested capital8.0%3.2%
FCF yield12.9%8.4%
Dividend yield—6.8%
Debt / equity0.741.97
Current ratio1.560.68
Altman Z (solvency)2.521.76
Piotroski F (quality)8 / 95 / 9
Full DAR report → Full GIS report →
Get boothcheck's read on DAR and GIS, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.