Cintas Corporation vs LEVI STRAUSS & CO, two Apparel stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.
Where CTAS and LEVI diverge most: on p/s, CTAS reads 7.08 and LEVI reads 1.09; on p/b, CTAS reads 15.72 and LEVI reads 3.02. The rest of the comparable metrics sit closer together. On valuation, today's CTAS price has a different growth bar priced in than LEVI (+27.7% implied for CTAS vs +7.9% for LEVI); the higher figure is the steeper assumption to clear, not a better or worse stock. What CTAS's price implies is a demanding bet versus history and the cohort (whole-company basis). What LEVI's price implies is a bet that sits within the historical range (whole-company basis). The bull and bear cases for each are in their full reports below.
| Metric | CTAS | LEVI |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $202.32 | $18.70 |
| Market cap | $81.8B | $7.3B |
| Sector | Apparel | Apparel |
| Stage | Mature | Mature |
| Implied growth (priced in) | +27.7% | +7.9% |
| P/E | 39.9 | 12.6 |
| P/B | 15.72 | 3.02 |
| P/S | 7.08 | 1.09 |
| EV/EBITDA | 28.4 | 7.9 |
| Revenue growth | +9.5% | +6.8% |
| Gross margin | 51.5% | 66.2% |
| Operating margin | 23.6% | 13.8% |
| Net margin | 17.8% | 8.8% |
| Return on equity | 39.6% | 24.4% |
| Return on assets | 19.3% | 8.5% |
| Return on invested capital | 28.3% | 20.4% |
| FCF yield | 2.5% | 8.8% |
| Dividend yield | 0.9% | 2.9% |
| Debt / equity | 0.47 | 0.43 |
| Current ratio | 1.45 | 1.63 |
| Altman Z (solvency) | 9.21 | 2.65 |
| Piotroski F (quality) | 8 / 9 | 6 / 9 |
Each week boothcheck ranks the stocks whose prices are betting on the most. Read the most stretched bets archive →
boothcheck is also on Android. Get the app on Google Play →
The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.