Capri Holdings Ltd vs Tapestry, Inc., two Luxury Goods stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.
Both are American luxury houses built on acquired brands, Tapestry with Coach and Kate Spade, Capri with Michael Kors, Versace and Jimmy Choo. Tapestry towers at $30.4B against Capri's $2.3B, and keeps more of each sale, 8.44% of revenue against 3.94%. Tapestry converts far more to free cash, a 5.77% yield against Capri's 0.6%, a gap that separates a house running well from one still restructuring. Tapestry trades richer on earnings, 44.09 times against Capri's 16.99, and pays a 0.96% dividend. The market prices Tapestry as the healthier operator and Capri as the cheaper bet on a brand recovery.
Comparison updated 2026-07-11.
| Metric | CPRI | TPR |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $18.05 | $140.74 |
| Market cap | $2.2B | $29.3B |
| Sector | Luxury Goods | Luxury Goods |
| Stage | Mature | Mature |
| Implied growth (priced in) | -3.8% | +11.8% |
| P/E | 15.8 | 42.5 |
| P/B | 25.91 | 42.96 |
| P/S | 0.63 | 3.73 |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.8 | 29.1 |
| Revenue growth | -4.1% | +14.1% |
| Gross margin | 64.8% | 76.9% |
| Operating margin | -3.4% | 22.3% |
| Net margin | 3.9% | 8.4% |
| Return on equity | 163.1% | 97.1% |
| Return on assets | 4.2% | 10.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 4.0% | 23.9% |
| FCF yield | 0.6% | 6.0% |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.0% |
| Debt / equity | 4.42 | 3.51 |
| Current ratio | 1.21 | 1.84 |
| Altman Z (solvency) | 3.45 | 4.02 |
| Piotroski F (quality) | 3 / 9 | 4 / 9 |
Each week boothcheck ranks the stocks whose prices are betting on the most. Read the most stretched bets archive →
boothcheck is also on Android. Get the app on Google Play →
The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.