← boothcheck

COCO vs MNST stock comparison

The Vita Coco Company, Inc. vs Monster Beverage Corp, two Beverages stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Where COCO and MNST diverge most: on net margin, COCO reads 12.6% and MNST reads 23.1%; on operating margin, COCO reads 18.7% and MNST reads 31.0%. The rest of the comparable metrics sit closer together. On valuation, today's COCO price has a different growth bar priced in than MNST (+33.1% implied for COCO vs +27.9% for MNST); the higher figure is the steeper assumption to clear, not a better or worse stock. What COCO's price implies is a somewhat stretched bet versus history (whole-company basis). What MNST's price implies is a somewhat stretched bet versus history (whole-company basis). The bull and bear cases for each are in their full reports below.

COCO vs MNST: the numbers

MetricCOCOMNST
Price$73.16$97.47
Market cap$4.4B$96.3B
SectorBeveragesBeverages
StageGrowthGrowth
Implied growth (priced in)+33.1%+27.9%
P/E53.0
P/B12.5611.04
P/S6.7210.95
EV/EBITDA43.436.1
Revenue growth+23.0%+18.1%
Gross margin40.0%55.0%
Operating margin18.7%31.0%
Net margin12.6%23.1%
Return on equity23.5%23.3%
Return on assets17.0%18.7%
Return on invested capital22.4%22.4%
FCF yield1.5%2.1%
Debt / equity0.000.00
Current ratio3.653.26
Altman Z (solvency)9.128.77
Piotroski F (quality)7 / 97 / 9
Full COCO report → Full MNST report →
Get boothcheck's read on COCO and MNST, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.