← boothcheck

CNO vs UNM stock comparison

CNO Financial Group, Inc. vs Unum Group, two Managed Care stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

CNO earns 9.8% on equity, Unum 7.2%, both unspectacular and both honest, insurance returns earned without leverage tricks (0 and 0.35 turns of debt). The niches neighbor each other, senior life-and-health at CNO, workplace disability at Unum, and the margins nearly match, 5.4% and 5.9% net. The market splits them mildly, 21.1 and 19.5 times earnings, dividends of 1.3% and 2%. Nothing on this page argues loudly for either; that is itself the finding. Two mid-cap insurers earning similar returns from similar customers at similar prices: the pair is as close to a coin flip as the sector prints, and the reader's conviction must come from somewhere other than these columns.

Comparison updated 2026-07-10.

CNO vs UNM: the numbers

MetricCNOUNM
Price$52.52$90.06
Market cap$5.0B$14.8B
SectorManaged CareManaged Care
StageMatureMature
P/E21.119.5
P/B2.021.36
P/S1.121.11
EV/EBITDA7.6
Revenue growth+5.0%+4.4%
Operating margin12.6%
Net margin5.4%5.9%
Return on equity9.8%7.2%
Return on assets0.6%1.3%
Return on invested capital18.0%
FCF yield13.6%3.6%
Dividend yield1.3%1.9%
Debt / equity0.000.35
Altman Z (solvency)0.300.69
Piotroski F (quality)7 / 99 / 9
Full CNO report → Full UNM report →
Get boothcheck's read on CNO and UNM, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.