← boothcheck

CCJ vs NEM stock comparison

CAMECO CORPORATION vs NEWMONT CORPORATION, two Mining stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

The growth stories run opposite: Newmont's gold franchise is priced as if the cycle peaked, 12.5 times earnings on a 30.1% net margin, while Cameco's uranium franchise is priced as if its cycle has barely begun, 105.3 times on 16.9%. The trailing tables belong to gold: returns on equity of 21.4% against 8.5%, free-cash yields of 8.8% against 1.7%, a visible 1% dividend. Both balance sheets are effectively clean. Ninety-three turns of multiple separate delivered earnings from expected ones, in the same sector, at the same moment. Whichever way the decade breaks, one of these two prices will look obviously wrong in hindsight; they usually both do, in opposite directions.

Comparison updated 2026-07-10.

CCJ vs NEM: the numbers

MetricCCJNEM
Price$104.56$96.09
Market cap$45.5B$104.4B
SectorMiningMining
StageCyclicalCyclical
P/E105.312.5
P/B8.972.98
P/S17.784.18
EV/EBITDA66.739.4
Revenue growth+24.4%+26.8%
Gross margin27.9%
Operating margin17.8%
Net margin16.9%30.1%
Return on equity8.5%21.4%
Return on assets5.7%13.0%
Return on invested capital6.8%
FCF yield1.7%8.8%
Dividend yield1.0%
Debt / equity0.000.14
Current ratio2.472.44
Altman Z (solvency)7.213.50
Piotroski F (quality)7 / 98 / 9
Full CCJ report → Full NEM report →
Get boothcheck's read on CCJ and NEM, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.