← boothcheck

BN vs PSA stock comparison

BROOKFIELD CORPORATION vs Public Storage, two REIT stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

For both, reported margins mislead, but Public Storage's 39.2% net margin is closer to real than most REITs' because self-storage carries light capex, while Brookfield's 4.31% reflects mark-timing on a diversified asset pool. Public Storage is a focused storage REIT with pricing power and a 3.7% dividend; Brookfield a diversified owner-manager paying none listed. PSA carries 1.04 turns of debt, Brookfield none shown; PSA trades at 33.5 times earnings, Brookfield at 84. The pair prices a self-storage REIT against a diversified compounder; Public Storage offers a legible, high-margin, dividend-paying landlord model, Brookfield a harder-to-value capital-appreciation vehicle, and the two illustrate how loosely the REIT sector tag stretches, from a single-asset-class rent collector to a sprawling alternative-asset holding.

Comparison updated 2026-07-11.

BN vs PSA: the numbers

MetricBNPSA
Price$42.87$324.33
Market cap$96.3B$57.1B
SectorREITREIT
StageMatureMature
P/E84.133.5
P/B0.586.12
P/S1.2811.74
EV/EBITDA7.740.8
Revenue growth+0.7%+2.9%
Operating margin39.0%
Net margin4.3%39.2%
Return on equity1.9%20.4%
Return on assets0.6%9.6%
Return on invested capital2.5%
FCF yield-3.9%5.6%
Dividend yield3.7%
Debt / equity0.001.04
Altman Z (solvency)0.313.49
Piotroski F (quality)8 / 98 / 9
Full BN report → Full PSA report →
Get boothcheck's read on BN and PSA, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.