← boothcheck

AMT vs BN stock comparison

AMERICAN TOWER CORP /MA/ vs BROOKFIELD CORPORATION, two REIT stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

What is priced in: American Tower at 28.3 times earnings is priced as a cell-tower REIT with contracted, escalating leases, Brookfield at 84 as a diversified alternative-asset holding whose GAAP earnings understate its economic value. For both, reported net income is a poor guide, tower depreciation for AMT, mark-to-market and carried-interest timing for BN. AMT pays a 3.88% dividend on its tower cash flows and carries 0.6 turns of debt; Brookfield pays none listed here and shows a negative free-cash figure as it deploys capital. The pair prices a focused infrastructure REIT against a sprawling asset manager and owner; AMT's tenant leases are the steadier, more legible cash stream, Brookfield the harder-to-value compounder, and their multiples say the market treats them as different animals.

Comparison updated 2026-07-11.

AMT vs BN: the numbers

MetricAMTBN
Price$175.33$42.87
Market cap$81.8B$96.3B
SectorREITREIT
StageMatureMature
P/E28.384.1
P/B8.060.58
P/S7.571.28
EV/EBITDA17.97.7
Revenue growth+6.3%+0.7%
Operating margin45.3%
Net margin27.8%4.3%
Return on equity29.6%1.9%
Return on assets4.8%0.6%
Return on invested capital25.6%
FCF yield4.6%-3.9%
Dividend yield3.9%
Debt / equity0.600.00
Current ratio0.30
Altman Z (solvency)0.920.31
Piotroski F (quality)7 / 98 / 9
Full AMT report → Full BN report →
Get boothcheck's read on AMT and BN, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.