← boothcheck

ARMK vs YUMC stock comparison

Aramark vs Yum China Holdings, Inc., two Restaurants stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Yum China operates KFC and Pizza Hut across China and generates cash the way Aramark cannot. Yum China throws off a 6.44% free cash flow yield, keeps 7.83% of revenue, returns 15.49% on equity, and runs debt-free while paying a 2.35% dividend. Aramark, a contract caterer and facilities firm, keeps just 1.84% of sales, carries 1.85 debt-to-equity, and posts a negative 5.24% cash yield. On price the gap is wide: Yum China trades at 15.64 times earnings, Aramark at 41.85 times. Both are large, with Yum China at $14.5B and Aramark at $14.9B, but the earnings quality favors the operator in China.

Comparison updated 2026-07-11.

ARMK vs YUMC: the numbers

MetricARMKYUMC
Price$57.89$43.04
Market cap$15.4B$15.2B
SectorRestaurantsRestaurants
StageMatureMature
Implied growth (priced in)+23.6%-1.8%
P/E43.216.5
P/B4.702.49
P/S0.791.26
EV/EBITDA19.28.2
Revenue growth+10.2%+6.7%
Operating margin4.5%13.7%
Net margin1.8%7.8%
Return on equity10.9%15.5%
Return on assets2.6%8.7%
Return on invested capital6.7%15.9%
FCF yield-5.1%6.1%
Dividend yield0.7%2.2%
Debt / equity1.850.00
Current ratio1.211.01
Altman Z (solvency)7.573.42
Piotroski F (quality)7 / 98 / 9
Full ARMK report → Full YUMC report →
Get boothcheck's read on ARMK and YUMC, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.