Aramark vs Yum China Holdings, Inc., two Restaurants stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.
Where ARMK and YUMC diverge most: on fcf yield, ARMK reads -5.0% and YUMC reads 6.3%; on debt / equity, ARMK reads 1.81 and YUMC reads 0.01. The rest of the comparable metrics sit closer together. What ARMK's price implies is a somewhat stretched bet versus history (whole-company basis). What YUMC's price implies is a bet that sits within the historical range (whole-company basis). The bull and bear cases for each are in their full reports below.
| Metric | ARMK | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $54.91 | $42.92 |
| Market cap | $14.7B | $15.0B |
| Sector | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Stage | Mature | Mature |
| Implied growth (priced in) | +17.4% | — |
| P/E | 38.4 | 15.7 |
| P/B | 4.34 | 2.47 |
| P/S | 0.74 | 1.20 |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.7 | 7.9 |
| Revenue growth | +11.1% | +8.9% |
| Operating margin | 4.3% | 11.1% |
| Net margin | 1.9% | 7.8% |
| Return on equity | 11.3% | 16.1% |
| Return on assets | 2.7% | 9.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 6.6% | 16.7% |
| FCF yield | -5.0% | 6.3% |
| Dividend yield | 0.8% | 2.2% |
| Debt / equity | 1.81 | 0.01 |
| Current ratio | 1.28 | 0.96 |
| Altman Z (solvency) | 7.61 | 3.33 |
| Piotroski F (quality) | 8 / 9 | 7 / 9 |
Each week boothcheck ranks the stocks whose prices are betting on the most. Read the most stretched bets archive →
boothcheck is also on Android. Get the app on Google Play →
The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.