Aramark vs BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC., two Restaurants stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.
Where ARMK and EAT diverge most: on fcf yield, ARMK reads -5.1% and EAT reads 6.1%; on return on equity, ARMK reads 10.9% and EAT reads 114.0%. The rest of the comparable metrics sit closer together. On valuation, today's ARMK price has a different growth bar priced in than EAT (+20.5% implied for ARMK vs +16.2% for EAT); the higher figure is the steeper assumption to clear, not a better or worse stock. What ARMK's price implies is a bet that sits within the historical range (whole-company basis). What EAT's price implies is a bet that sits within the historical range (whole-company basis). The bull and bear cases for each are in their full reports below.
| Metric | ARMK | EAT |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $57.13 | $186.91 |
| Market cap | $15.2B | $8.3B |
| Sector | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Stage | Mature | Mature |
| Implied growth (priced in) | +20.5% | +16.2% |
| P/E | 42.6 | 18.3 |
| P/B | 4.64 | 20.49 |
| P/S | 0.78 | 1.45 |
| EV/EBITDA | 19.0 | 14.6 |
| Revenue growth | +10.2% | +12.4% |
| Operating margin | 4.5% | 11.3% |
| Net margin | 1.8% | 8.1% |
| Return on equity | 10.9% | 114.0% |
| Return on assets | 2.6% | 16.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 6.7% | 54.9% |
| FCF yield | -5.1% | 6.1% |
| Dividend yield | 0.7% | 0.6% |
| Debt / equity | 1.85 | 1.11 |
| Current ratio | 1.21 | 0.40 |
| Altman Z (solvency) | 7.57 | 8.36 |
| Piotroski F (quality) | 7 / 9 | 8 / 9 |
Each week boothcheck ranks the stocks whose prices are betting on the most. Read the most stretched bets archive →
boothcheck is also on Android. Get the app on Google Play →
The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.