← boothcheck

ARMK vs TXRH stock comparison

Aramark vs Texas Roadhouse, Inc., two Restaurants stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Texas Roadhouse shows what a disciplined restaurant model looks like next to Aramark's contract-services grind. The steakhouse operator earns a 7% net margin, returns 27.58% on equity, and carries almost no debt at 0.03 debt-to-equity, while paying a 1.38% dividend. Aramark, which feeds stadiums and campuses rather than running a dining brand, keeps only 1.84% of revenue, leans on 1.85 debt-to-equity, and posts a negative 5.24% free cash flow yield against Texas Roadhouse's positive 2.77%. Priced at 41.85 times earnings, Aramark costs more than Texas Roadhouse at 31.36 times. The steakhouse is worth $13.0B, Aramark $14.9B.

Comparison updated 2026-07-11.

ARMK vs TXRH: the numbers

MetricARMKTXRH
Price$57.89$189.48
Market cap$15.4B$12.5B
SectorRestaurantsRestaurants
StageMatureMature
Implied growth (priced in)+23.6%+19.2%
P/E43.230.2
P/B4.708.14
P/S0.792.07
EV/EBITDA19.217.6
Revenue growth+10.2%+10.4%
Operating margin4.5%9.0%
Net margin1.8%7.0%
Return on equity10.9%27.6%
Return on assets2.6%11.9%
Return on invested capital6.7%26.2%
FCF yield-5.1%2.9%
Dividend yield0.7%1.4%
Debt / equity1.850.03
Current ratio1.210.46
Altman Z (solvency)7.575.97
Piotroski F (quality)7 / 96 / 9
Full ARMK report → Full TXRH report →
Get boothcheck's read on ARMK and TXRH, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.