AMPHENOL CORPORATION vs NVIDIA CORP, two Semiconductors stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.
Where APH and NVDA diverge most: on dividend yield, APH reads 0.8% and NVDA reads 0.0%; on debt / equity, APH reads 1.20 and NVDA reads 0.15. The rest of the comparable metrics sit closer together. On valuation, today's APH price has a different growth bar priced in than NVDA (+6.8% implied for APH vs +47.9% for NVDA); the higher figure is the steeper assumption to clear, not a better or worse stock. What APH's price implies is a bet that sits within the historical range (whole-company basis). What NVDA's price implies is a bet that sits within the historical range (whole-company basis). The bull and bear cases for each are in their full reports below.
| Metric | APH | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $87.23 | $229.47 |
| Market cap | $107.6B | $5.57T |
| Sector | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Stage | Growth | Mature |
| Implied growth (priced in) | +6.8% | +47.9% |
| P/E | 21.9 | 29.0 |
| P/B | 6.89 | 24.34 |
| P/S | 3.71 | 18.39 |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.2 | 28.1 |
| Revenue growth | +54.0% | +81.7% |
| Gross margin | 40.5% | 75.0% |
| Operating margin | 29.5% | 66.2% |
| Net margin | 17.7% | 54.1% |
| Return on equity | 32.9% | 71.6% |
| Return on assets | 11.5% | 51.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 17.0% | 62.9% |
| FCF yield | 4.4% | 2.3% |
| Dividend yield | 0.8% | 0.0% |
| Debt / equity | 1.20 | 0.15 |
| Current ratio | 1.89 | 4.59 |
| Altman Z (solvency) | 3.64 | 9.14 |
| Piotroski F (quality) | 7 / 9 | 5 / 9 |
Each week boothcheck ranks the stocks whose prices are betting on the most. Read the most stretched bets archive →
boothcheck is also on Android. Get the app on Google Play →
The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.