← boothcheck

AMAT vs UMC stock comparison

APPLIED MATERIALS INC /DE vs United Microelectronics Corporation, two Semiconductors stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Applied Materials earns 33% on equity and 20% on assets; UMC earns 13% and 8.7%, and the gap is structural rather than cyclical. UMC fabricates trailing-edge chips where pricing is a commodity negotiation, while Applied Materials sells the tools every foundry, leading or trailing, must buy. UMC's headline multiple, 213 times earnings with a free-cash yield of nearly zero, is the arithmetic of a depressed earnings base rather than a growth premium, and reads as an artifact accordingly. Applied Materials at 58.7 times is expensive the ordinary way. One number is a valuation; the other is a symptom.

Comparison updated 2026-07-10.

AMAT vs UMC: the numbers

MetricAMATUMC
Price$624.00$25.58
Market cap$498.6B$311.4B
SectorSemiconductorsSemiconductors
StageMatureGrowth
P/E58.7213.2
P/B20.8527.92
P/S17.1843.56
EV/EBITDA58.3195.8
Revenue growth+3.4%+8.9%
Gross margin49.9%32.3%
Operating margin31.9%22.0%
Net margin27.3%20.8%
Return on equity33.1%13.3%
Return on assets19.6%8.7%
Return on invested capital23.8%12.0%
FCF yield1.1%0.1%
Dividend yield0.3%
Debt / equity0.270.00
Current ratio2.512.45
Altman Z (solvency)9.396.96
Piotroski F (quality)6 / 96 / 9
Full AMAT report → Full UMC report →
Get boothcheck's read on AMAT and UMC, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.