← boothcheck

AMAT vs TXN stock comparison

APPLIED MATERIALS INC /DE vs TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED, two Semiconductors stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

The margin comparison is closer than the businesses suggest: Texas Instruments' analog catalog earns a 37.5% operating margin, Applied Materials' equipment franchise 31.9%, and TI keeps the higher gross margin too, 58% to 50%. What separates them is what the cash is for. TI runs as a shareholder-payout machine, a 1.9% dividend on 48.8 times earnings; Applied Materials pays almost nothing out at 58.7 times, its cash conscripted into the equipment cycle. Return on equity is a near tie, 32% and 33%. Two of the steadiest operators in semiconductors, both priced at multiples that assume the industry's current appetite is the new normal.

Comparison updated 2026-07-10.

AMAT vs TXN: the numbers

MetricAMATTXN
Price$624.00$285.42
Market cap$498.6B$260.9B
SectorSemiconductorsSemiconductors
StageMatureGrowth
P/E58.748.8
P/B20.8515.55
P/S17.1814.15
EV/EBITDA58.338.7
Revenue growth+3.4%+14.9%
Gross margin49.9%58.0%
Operating margin31.9%37.5%
Net margin27.3%29.1%
Return on equity33.1%32.0%
Return on assets19.6%15.6%
Return on invested capital23.8%18.3%
FCF yield1.1%1.4%
Dividend yield0.3%1.9%
Debt / equity0.270.91
Current ratio2.514.46
Altman Z (solvency)9.399.22
Piotroski F (quality)6 / 96 / 9
Full AMAT report → Full TXN report →
Get boothcheck's read on AMAT and TXN, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.