← boothcheck

ADM vs SFD stock comparison

ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND CO vs SMITHFIELD FOODS, INC., two Food & Beverage stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Where ADM and SFD diverge most: on revenue growth, ADM reads -3.7% and SFD reads +7.8%; on fcf yield, ADM reads 12.5% and SFD reads -4.0%. The rest of the comparable metrics sit closer together. What SFD's price implies is a bet that sits within the historical range (whole-company basis). The bull and bear cases for each are in their full reports below.

ADM vs SFD: the numbers

MetricADMSFD
Price$79.22$26.03
Market cap$38.3B$10.3B
SectorFood & BeverageFood & Beverage
StageMatureMature
Implied growth (priced in)+5.3%
P/E35.410.2
P/B1.681.50
P/S0.480.66
EV/EBITDA38.77.1
Revenue growth-3.7%+7.8%
Gross margin6.0%13.4%
Operating margin8.8%
Net margin1.3%6.5%
Return on equity4.7%14.7%
Return on assets1.9%8.4%
Return on invested capital12.3%
FCF yield12.5%-4.0%
Dividend yield2.6%3.8%
Debt / equity0.360.20
Current ratio1.312.41
Altman Z (solvency)8.168.14
Piotroski F (quality)6 / 93 / 9
Full ADM report → Full SFD report →
Get boothcheck's read on ADM and SFD, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.