← boothcheck

QFIN vs UWMC stock comparison

Qfin Holdings, Inc. vs UWM HOLDINGS CORPORATION, two Mortgage Finance stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Neither top line's growth prints here, but the models say where growth would come from: Qfin compounds by matching more Chinese borrowers at a 31.1% net margin, UWM by originating more mortgages when rates finally allow, currently at 1.9%. The multiples, 5 and 6.6 times, are twin discounts for unrelated reasons: jurisdiction and cycle. Qfin's balance sheet is clean with a 36% free-cash yield; UWM's carries 1.86 turns and warehouse cash noise. Returns on equity, 24.7% against 4.2%. Two of the sector's cheapest names, one earning at full capacity and distrusted, one earning at minimum capacity and tolerated; the pair is a taxonomy of discounts more than a comparison of firms.

Comparison updated 2026-07-10.

QFIN vs UWMC: the numbers

MetricQFINUWMC
Price$15.82$2.19
Market cap$4.3B$3.5B
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
StageMatureGrowth
Implied growth (priced in)+12.6%
P/E5.06.6
P/B1.252.19
P/S1.571.02
EV/EBITDA3.8103.7
Revenue growth+1.7%+28.3%
Operating margin34.8%
Net margin31.1%1.9%
Return on equity24.7%4.2%
Return on assets10.5%0.3%
Debt / equity0.001.86
Current ratio2.43
Altman Z (solvency)2.490.31
Piotroski F (quality)6 / 96 / 9
Full QFIN report → Full UWMC report →
Get boothcheck's read on QFIN and UWMC, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.