← boothcheck

PSX vs VLO stock comparison

Phillips 66 vs VALERO ENERGY CORP/TX, two Oil & Gas Refining stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

The margin lines run thin at both, Phillips 66's 3.1% net against Valero's 3.4%, refining economics in a soft-crack year, but the returns nearly tie too, 13.9% on equity against 15.6%, Valero ahead. The two are close peers, big independent-adjacent refiners (Phillips with more chemicals and midstream, Valero purer refining). The multiples sit at 17 and 19 times; dividends at 2.8% and 1.7%; both near-zero debt. Free cash favors Valero, 7% against 3.6%. The pair prices two downstream franchises within a couple of turns; Phillips diversifies its crack-spread exposure with chemicals and pipelines, Valero concentrates on refining, and the market charges Valero a small premium for the focus its returns partly earn.

Comparison updated 2026-07-11.

PSX vs VLO: the numbers

MetricPSXVLO
Price$171.67$259.41
Market cap$69.2B$77.3B
SectorOil & Gas RefiningOil & Gas Refining
StageCyclicalCyclical
Implied growth (priced in)+0.1%+9.4%
P/E17.018.9
P/B2.332.87
P/S0.510.62
EV/EBITDA24.08.9
Revenue growth-1.8%-2.4%
Operating margin5.3%
Net margin3.1%3.4%
Return on equity13.9%15.6%
Return on assets4.9%6.8%
Return on invested capital15.9%
FCF yield3.6%7.0%
Dividend yield2.8%1.7%
Debt / equity0.280.04
Current ratio1.131.58
Altman Z (solvency)2.969.40
Piotroski F (quality)5 / 97 / 9
Full PSX report → Full VLO report →
Get boothcheck's read on PSX and VLO, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.