MOLINA HEALTHCARE, INC. vs Unum Group, two Managed Care stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.
The margin comparison is fourteen-fold, 5.9% net at Unum against 0.42% at Molina, and it is mostly a story about who sets prices: Unum prices workplace disability policies from actuarial tables it controls, Molina takes Medicaid rates from legislatures it does not. Unum trades at 19.5 times earnings with a 2% dividend; Molina's earnings are too thin to price. Returns on equity run 7.2% against 4.6%. Both carry moderate leverage. The pair is a regulated-revenue seminar: similar scale of premium, opposite ownership of the pricing pen, and the market charges nineteen turns for the difference between underwriting and administering.
Comparison updated 2026-07-10.
| Metric | MOH | UNM |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $229.88 | $90.06 |
| Market cap | $11.7B | $14.8B |
| Sector | Managed Care | Managed Care |
| Stage | Mature | Mature |
| P/E | — | 19.5 |
| P/B | 2.87 | 1.36 |
| P/S | 0.26 | 1.11 |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.5 | — |
| Revenue growth | +8.0% | +4.4% |
| Operating margin | 0.8% | — |
| Net margin | 0.4% | 5.9% |
| Return on equity | 4.6% | 7.2% |
| Return on assets | 1.1% | 1.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 2.6% | — |
| FCF yield | 2.1% | 3.6% |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.9% |
| Debt / equity | 0.92 | 0.35 |
| Current ratio | 1.63 | — |
| Altman Z (solvency) | 4.02 | 0.69 |
| Piotroski F (quality) | 7 / 9 | 9 / 9 |
Each week boothcheck ranks the stocks whose prices are betting on the most. Read the most stretched bets archive →
boothcheck is also on Android. Get the app on Google Play →
The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.