MetLife, Inc. vs MANULIFE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, two Insurance stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.
Where MET and MFC diverge most: on revenue growth, MET reads +5.4% and MFC reads -9.8%; on debt / equity, MET reads 0.03 and MFC reads 0.00. The rest of the comparable metrics sit closer together. What MET's price implies is a somewhat stretched bet versus history (earnings-power basis). What MFC's price implies is a somewhat stretched bet versus history (earnings-power basis). The bull and bear cases for each are in their full reports below.
| Metric | MET | MFC |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $96.13 | $44.47 |
| Market cap | $63.0B | $75.7B |
| Sector | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| Stage | Mature | Mature |
| P/E | 18.6 | 19.6 |
| P/B | 2.28 | 1.96 |
| P/S | 0.81 | 3.57 |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.3 | — |
| Revenue growth | +5.4% | -9.8% |
| Operating margin | 8.6% | — |
| Net margin | 4.7% | 21.0% |
| Return on equity | 13.1% | 11.6% |
| Return on assets | 0.5% | 0.6% |
| Dividend yield | 2.3% | — |
| Debt / equity | 0.03 | 0.00 |
| Piotroski F (quality) | 8 / 9 | 8 / 9 |
Each week boothcheck ranks the stocks whose prices are betting on the most. Read the most stretched bets archive →
boothcheck is also on Android. Get the app on Google Play →
The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.