← boothcheck

LRCX vs PH stock comparison

LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION vs PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION, two Industrial Machinery stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Lam Research keeps 31 cents of every sales dollar as profit etching and depositing the layers inside a chip, while Parker-Hannifin, making industrial motion parts, keeps about 17, and that margin gap is the whole story of the pair. The same advantage runs up the statement: Lam earns 63% on equity and 32% on assets to Parker's 24% and 11%, real economics rather than a thinned base, since debt is modest at 0.35 times equity and current assets cover liabilities 2.5 times over. So the market pays roughly double for it, near 73 times earnings to Parker's 34. Parker is the cash-and-dividend side, a 3.1% free-cash yield to Lam's 1.2 and a higher payout. Lam is priced for the chip-equipment cycle; Parker for the slow industrial one.

Comparison updated 2026-06-15.

LRCX vs PH: the numbers

MetricLRCXPH
Price$350.21$960.77
Market cap$440.3B$123.0B
SectorIndustrial MachineryIndustrial Machinery
StageMatureMature
P/E66.235.4
P/B41.608.41
P/S20.315.86
EV/EBITDA58.424.3
Revenue growth+26.8%+6.1%
Gross margin49.8%
Operating margin35.0%22.4%
Net margin30.9%16.6%
Return on equity63.4%23.8%
Return on assets32.3%11.3%
Return on invested capital47.1%23.1%
FCF yield1.4%3.0%
Dividend yield0.3%0.7%
Debt / equity0.350.14
Current ratio2.541.13
Altman Z (solvency)10.006.52
Piotroski F (quality)6 / 98 / 9
Full LRCX report → Full PH report →
Get boothcheck's read on LRCX and PH, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.