← boothcheck

IMO vs PSX stock comparison

IMPERIAL OIL LIMITED vs Phillips 66, two Oil & Gas Refining stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Return on assets is where this pair splits: Imperial Oil at 6.4% against Phillips 66's 4.9%, the integrated Canadian major out-earning the US downstream specialist per dollar of assets, though Phillips leads on equity, 13.9% against 12.8%. Imperial is oil sands plus refining under Exxon's majority ownership; Phillips is refining, chemicals, and midstream. Imperial trades dearer, 26.1 times against 17, the market paying up for integrated upstream reserves over downstream margin capture. Both pay near-2% dividends, both run light leverage. Free cash favors Imperial, 5.2% against 3.6%. The pair prices reserves-plus-refining against refining-plus-chemicals; the Canadian integrated's premium is upstream optionality, the American specialist's discount is downstream focus.

Comparison updated 2026-07-11.

IMO vs PSX: the numbers

MetricIMOPSX
Price$113.36$171.67
Market cap$55.0B$69.2B
SectorOil & Gas RefiningOil & Gas Refining
StageCyclicalCyclical
Implied growth (priced in)+12.0%+0.1%
P/E26.117.0
P/B3.292.33
P/S1.590.51
EV/EBITDA30.124.0
Revenue growth-9.1%-1.8%
Net margin6.2%3.1%
Return on equity12.8%13.9%
Return on assets6.4%4.9%
FCF yield5.2%3.6%
Dividend yield1.9%2.8%
Debt / equity0.150.28
Current ratio1.231.13
Altman Z (solvency)3.742.96
Piotroski F (quality)6 / 95 / 9
Full IMO report → Full PSX report →
Get boothcheck's read on IMO and PSX, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.