← boothcheck

GH vs RDNT stock comparison

GUARDANT HEALTH, INC. vs RadNet, Inc., two Medical Diagnostics stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Both diagnostics operators lose money, and the losses could not be less alike: Guardant's negative 40.2% operating margin is chosen, R&D and commercial spend toward cancer-screening dominance, while RadNet's negative 4.2% is structural, imaging-center economics under wage and rate pressure. The market prices intent over accident by a factor of four, $20B against $5B. RadNet generates real cash despite the losses, a 7.2% free-cash yield from depreciation-heavy accounting; Guardant burns modestly against a 4.7 current ratio war chest. Neither has an earnings multiple. One loss is a strategy with a prize attached; the other is a business model doing its best; the valuations grade the difference unsentimentally.

Comparison updated 2026-07-10.

GH vs RDNT: the numbers

MetricGHRDNT
Price$149.32$60.71
Market cap$19.6B$4.7B
SectorMedical DiagnosticsMedical Diagnostics
StageGrowthGrowth
P/B3.46
P/S18.152.18
EV/EBITDA23.8
Revenue growth+39.3%+14.7%
Operating margin-40.2%-4.2%
Net margin-40.1%-0.7%
Return on equity-1.1%
Return on assets-22.6%-0.4%
Return on invested capital-26.7%2.0%
FCF yield-1.2%7.2%
Debt / equity0.82
Current ratio4.681.17
Altman Z (solvency)4.371.63
Piotroski F (quality)3 / 96 / 9
Full GH report → Full RDNT report →
Get boothcheck's read on GH and RDNT, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.