← boothcheck

FINV vs UWMC stock comparison

FinVolution Group vs UWM HOLDINGS CORPORATION, two Mortgage Finance stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

The margin gap runs ten to one: FinVolution keeps 18.7% of revenue as net income brokering Chinese consumer loans, UWM 1.9% originating American mortgages at the bottom of the rate cycle. Structure explains most of it, a matchmaking platform against a warehouse-funded machine at 1.86 turns of debt, and cycle explains the rest. The multiples nearly meet anyway, 17.8 and 6.6 times, because UWM's earnings are priced as trough and FinVolution's as taxed by jurisdiction. Free cash tells the model difference plainly: positive 4% at the platform, negative 158% at the originator (warehouse plumbing, not distress). Two lending middlemen, one paid in fees, one paid in gain-on-sale; the fee model wins every printed line except the market's imagination.

Comparison updated 2026-07-10.

FINV vs UWMC: the numbers

MetricFINVUWMC
Price$4.80$2.19
Market cap$6.4B$3.5B
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
StageGrowthGrowth
Implied growth (priced in)+12.6%
P/E17.86.6
P/B2.662.19
P/S3.301.02
EV/EBITDA613.1103.7
Revenue growth+200.0%+28.3%
Net margin18.7%1.9%
Return on equity15.1%4.2%
Return on assets10.0%0.3%
Debt / equity0.021.86
Altman Z (solvency)4.330.31
Piotroski F (quality)6 / 96 / 9
Full FINV report → Full UWMC report →
Get boothcheck's read on FINV and UWMC, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.