← boothcheck

DXCM vs RMD stock comparison

DEXCOM, INC. vs ResMed Inc., two Medical Devices stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

ResMed currently earns more on capital than Dexcom on assets, 17.3% against 14%, while Dexcom's 31.5% return on equity edges ResMed's 23.4%, both earned nearly debt-free, which makes this the rare device pair where the ratios need no forensic notes. The margin structures diverge more, ResMed's 34.9% operating against Dexcom's 21.4% on nearly identical gross margins near 62-63%, spend discipline against growth spend. The market prices Dexcom's diabetes-sensor growth at 30.1 times earnings and ResMed's sleep franchise at 19.3, the GLP-1 cloud parked over both but billed only to one. Free-cash yields sit at 5.2% and 6%. Two excellent monitors of chronic conditions, one priced with its anxiety included.

Comparison updated 2026-07-10.

DXCM vs RMD: the numbers

MetricDXCMRMD
Price$70.09$200.28
Market cap$27.6B$29.2B
SectorMedical DevicesMedical Devices
StageGrowthMature
Implied growth (priced in)+4.3%
P/E30.119.3
P/B9.334.50
P/S5.735.27
EV/EBITDA20.513.3
Revenue growth+16.3%+10.3%
Gross margin63.0%62.3%
Operating margin21.4%34.9%
Net margin19.3%27.4%
Return on equity31.5%23.4%
Return on assets14.0%17.3%
Return on invested capital25.9%21.0%
FCF yield5.2%6.0%
Dividend yield1.1%
Debt / equity0.000.10
Current ratio1.953.01
Altman Z (solvency)6.298.30
Piotroski F (quality)7 / 97 / 9
Full DXCM report → Full RMD report →
Get boothcheck's read on DXCM and RMD, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.