← boothcheck

CIEN vs ERIC stock comparison

Ciena Corp vs ERICSSON LM TELEPHONE CO, two Communication Equipment stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

One number defines the pair: 13.5, Ericsson's price against its trailing earnings, sitting next to Ciena's 159.9. The gap is not about quality, the operating margins nearly touch, 16.3% and 15.1%, and Ericsson earns the better returns, 26% on equity against 15.2%. It is about direction: Ciena's earnings are compressed while AI datacenter interconnect orders build, so the market pays forward; Ericsson's telecom-equipment earnings are ample and expected to stay ordinary, so the market pays little and collects a 7.9% free-cash yield. Both are lightly levered. A twelvefold multiple gap between two healthy networking vendors is the market drawing a hard line between optical AI plumbing and cellular maintenance.

Comparison updated 2026-07-10.

CIEN vs ERIC: the numbers

MetricCIENERIC
Price$479.66$10.96
Market cap$70.2B$36.5B
SectorCommunication EquipmentCommunication Equipment
StageGrowthMature
P/E159.913.5
P/B24.273.48
P/S12.601.62
EV/EBITDA130.07.1
Revenue growth+30.6%+0.9%
Gross margin44.0%47.6%
Operating margin15.1%16.3%
Net margin7.9%12.1%
Return on equity15.2%26.0%
Return on assets7.3%10.3%
Return on invested capital10.9%26.3%
FCF yield1.2%7.9%
Debt / equity0.530.00
Current ratio2.731.29
Altman Z (solvency)6.857.77
Piotroski F (quality)7 / 97 / 9
Full CIEN report → Full ERIC report →
Get boothcheck's read on CIEN and ERIC, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.