The Cigna Group vs HUMANA INC, two Managed Care stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.
Where CI and HUM diverge most: on fcf yield, CI reads 13.8% and HUM reads 2.5%; on net margin, CI reads 2.2% and HUM reads 0.8%. The rest of the comparable metrics sit closer together. The bull and bear cases for each are in their full reports below.
| Metric | CI | HUM |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $282.30 | $431.07 |
| Market cap | $74.5B | $52.0B |
| Sector | Managed Care | Managed Care |
| Stage | Mature | Growth |
| P/E | 11.7 | — |
| P/B | 1.74 | 2.79 |
| P/S | 0.26 | 0.38 |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.9 | 19.6 |
| Revenue growth | +7.8% | +13.9% |
| Operating margin | 3.7% | 4.4% |
| Net margin | 2.2% | 0.8% |
| Return on equity | 14.5% | 6.1% |
| Return on assets | 4.0% | 2.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 11.1% | 5.9% |
| FCF yield | 13.8% | 2.5% |
| Dividend yield | 2.1% | 0.8% |
| Debt / equity | 0.74 | 0.75 |
| Current ratio | 0.85 | 1.77 |
| Altman Z (solvency) | 2.63 | 4.56 |
| Piotroski F (quality) | 6 / 9 | 8 / 9 |
Each week boothcheck ranks the stocks whose prices are betting on the most. Read the most stretched bets archive →
boothcheck is also on Android. Get the app on Google Play →
The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.