← boothcheck

CCJ vs FNV stock comparison

CAMECO CORPORATION vs Franco-Nevada Corporation, two Mining stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Franco-Nevada nets 54% of revenue owning royalties; Cameco nets 16.9% mining and converting uranium, and the margin gap is model, not skill. What unites the pages is pricing: 58.5 and 105.3 times earnings, two of the sector's most expensive multiples, each carrying a story its trailing year cannot. Franco's story is permanence, royalty cash through every cycle; Cameco's is the nuclear decade. Returns on equity nearly tie at 9.3% and 8.5%, remarkably low for such premium prices. Both are debt-free. The pair prices two forms of faith, compounding and renaissance; the reader should notice that neither faith currently earns double digits on its capital.

Comparison updated 2026-07-10.

CCJ vs FNV: the numbers

MetricCCJFNV
Price$104.56$215.28
Market cap$45.5B$41.5B
SectorMiningMining
StageCyclicalCyclical
P/E105.358.5
P/B8.975.43
P/S17.7831.63
EV/EBITDA66.734.9
Revenue growth+24.4%+4.0%
Gross margin27.9%73.6%
Operating margin17.8%82.8%
Net margin16.9%54.0%
Return on equity8.5%9.3%
Return on assets5.7%8.6%
Return on invested capital6.8%9.3%
FCF yield1.7%4.5%
Debt / equity0.000.00
Current ratio2.478.30
Altman Z (solvency)7.216.65
Piotroski F (quality)7 / 98 / 9
Full CCJ report → Full FNV report →
Get boothcheck's read on CCJ and FNV, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.