← boothcheck

BHP vs FNV stock comparison

BHP GROUP LIMITED vs Franco-Nevada Corporation, two Mining stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Franco-Nevada's 82.8% operating margin against BHP's 38%: royalty economics against extraction economics, and the gap is definitional rather than earned, royalties having no trucks to fuel. Below the margins the giant reasserts itself: BHP earns 21.3% on equity against 9.3%, on forty times the operational footprint. The multiples price the royalty model at 58.5 times and the miner at 22.8, both premium for their categories. Free-cash yields sit at 4.5% both, a coincidence that flatters neither. The pair prices the purest form of commodity exposure against the broadest; the purest costs two and a half times more per earnings dollar and earns less than half the return on capital.

Comparison updated 2026-07-10.

BHP vs FNV: the numbers

MetricBHPFNV
Price$81.00$215.28
Market cap$205.5B$41.5B
SectorMiningMining
StageCyclicalCyclical
Implied growth (priced in)+4.2%
P/E22.858.5
P/B3.935.43
P/S4.0131.63
EV/EBITDA7.734.9
Revenue growth-1.8%+4.0%
Gross margin73.6%
Operating margin38.0%82.8%
Net margin21.7%54.0%
Return on equity21.3%9.3%
Return on assets10.2%8.6%
Return on invested capital22.6%9.3%
FCF yield4.5%4.5%
Debt / equity0.000.00
Current ratio1.468.30
Altman Z (solvency)3.876.65
Piotroski F (quality)6 / 98 / 9
Full BHP report → Full FNV report →
Get boothcheck's read on BHP and FNV, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.