BHP GROUP LIMITED vs CAMECO CORPORATION, two Mining stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.
Where BHP and CCJ diverge most: on revenue growth, BHP reads -1.1% and CCJ reads +24.4%; on ev/ebitda, BHP reads 8.1 and CCJ reads 54.9. The rest of the comparable metrics sit closer together. The bull and bear cases for each are in their full reports below.
| Metric | BHP | CCJ |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $84.46 | $86.36 |
| Market cap | $214.2B | $37.6B |
| Sector | Mining | Mining |
| Stage | Cyclical | Cyclical |
| Implied growth (priced in) | +9.7% | — |
| P/E | 23.8 | 87.0 |
| P/B | 4.10 | 7.41 |
| P/S | 4.18 | 14.69 |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.1 | 54.9 |
| Revenue growth | -1.1% | +24.4% |
| Gross margin | — | 27.9% |
| Operating margin | 38.0% | 17.8% |
| Net margin | 21.7% | 16.9% |
| Return on equity | 21.3% | 8.5% |
| Return on assets | 10.2% | 5.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 22.6% | 6.8% |
| FCF yield | 4.3% | 2.1% |
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 1.46 | 2.47 |
| Altman Z (solvency) | 3.96 | 7.21 |
| Piotroski F (quality) | 6 / 9 | 7 / 9 |
Each week boothcheck ranks the stocks whose prices are betting on the most. Read the most stretched bets archive →
boothcheck is also on Android. Get the app on Google Play →
The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.