← boothcheck

BHP vs CCJ stock comparison

BHP GROUP LIMITED vs CAMECO CORPORATION, two Mining stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

BHP and Cameco share clean balance sheets and nothing else about their pricing: 22.8 times earnings for the diversified giant, 105.3 for the uranium producer, both multiples carrying stories rather than trailing arithmetic. BHP's story is breadth, iron ore, copper, and potash at a 21.3% return on equity; Cameco's is the nuclear renaissance, contracted volumes into reactor restarts at 8.5% returns while the thesis matures. Net margins favor BHP, 21.7% against 16.9%, free cash too, 4.5% against 1.7%. The pair prices the industrial present against the atomic future at a 4.6-fold spread; commodity multiples this far apart are the market doing narrative arithmetic, and admitting it.

Comparison updated 2026-07-10.

BHP vs CCJ: the numbers

MetricBHPCCJ
Price$81.00$104.56
Market cap$205.5B$45.5B
SectorMiningMining
StageCyclicalCyclical
Implied growth (priced in)+4.2%
P/E22.8105.3
P/B3.938.97
P/S4.0117.78
EV/EBITDA7.766.7
Revenue growth-1.8%+24.4%
Gross margin27.9%
Operating margin38.0%17.8%
Net margin21.7%16.9%
Return on equity21.3%8.5%
Return on assets10.2%5.7%
Return on invested capital22.6%6.8%
FCF yield4.5%1.7%
Debt / equity0.000.00
Current ratio1.462.47
Altman Z (solvency)3.877.21
Piotroski F (quality)6 / 97 / 9
Full BHP report → Full CCJ report →
Get boothcheck's read on BHP and CCJ, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.