← boothcheck

AFL vs CNC stock comparison

AFLAC INC vs CENTENE CORPORATION. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Aflac's balance sheet is unusually solid for an insurer, 0.26 of debt to equity beneath a 25.6% net margin from supplemental policies; Centene's carries 0.76 turns against a business currently running a negative 3.3% net margin, Medicaid rate resets colliding with utilization. The multiples split accordingly, 13.7 times for Aflac's steady earnings, none for Centene's losses. Centene's eye-catching 21.8% free-cash figure is insurance-float arithmetic, premium cash arriving ahead of claims, not distributable yield. Aflac pays a 2% dividend from earnings that exist. One page shows underwriting discipline priced modestly; the other shows a turnaround priced as one, with the recovery still ahead of the accounting.

Comparison updated 2026-07-10.

AFL vs CNC: the numbers

MetricAFLCNC
Price$125.63$63.40
Market cap$64.7B$31.4B
SectorFinancial ServicesManaged Care
StageMatureGrowth
P/E14.4
P/B2.161.46
P/S3.570.16
Revenue growth+14.9%+17.4%
Gross margin11.3%
Operating margin3.7%
Net margin25.6%-3.3%
Return on equity15.5%-30.0%
Return on assets4.0%-7.9%
Return on invested capital-14.1%
FCF yield22.6%
Dividend yield1.9%
Debt / equity0.260.76
Current ratio1.12
Altman Z (solvency)3.08
Piotroski F (quality)7 / 96 / 9
Full AFL report → Full CNC report →
Get boothcheck's read on AFL and CNC, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.