← boothcheck

A vs TMO stock comparison

AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. vs THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC., two Scientific Instruments stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Agilent and Thermo Fisher both sell to laboratories, but they are different animals: Agilent is an instruments-and-consumables specialist, Thermo Fisher a $191B general store for science assembled through years of acquisitions. Focus is winning the margin contest at the moment, Agilent's 21.7% operating margin against Thermo's 16.9%, with the return on assets nearly double, 10.8% to 6.1%. The acquisition engine shows up on Thermo's balance sheet as 0.89 of debt to equity versus Agilent's 0.47. Yet the market prices them within a point of each other, 27.3 and 28.2 times earnings, effectively declining to choose between breadth and focus. At the same multiple, the buyer is picking a temperament rather than a discount.

Comparison updated 2026-07-10.

A vs TMO: the numbers

MetricATMO
Price$135.99$512.74
Market cap$38.5B$191.3B
SectorScientific InstrumentsScientific Instruments
StageMatureMature
Implied growth (priced in)+21.6%
P/E27.328.2
P/B5.403.68
P/S5.324.23
EV/EBITDA24.726.1
Revenue growth+9.1%+5.3%
Operating margin21.7%16.9%
Net margin19.6%15.2%
Return on equity19.9%13.2%
Return on assets10.8%6.0%
Return on invested capital12.3%6.4%
FCF yield2.8%3.5%
Dividend yield0.7%0.3%
Debt / equity0.470.89
Current ratio2.101.53
Altman Z (solvency)4.957.28
Piotroski F (quality)6 / 95 / 9
Full A report → Full TMO report →
Get boothcheck's read on A and TMO, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.